< 1 min reading time
As originally asked by William Hulbig. Jorge Cardona George Mills William (Bill) Hulbig George Mills William (Bill) Hulbig George Mills William (Bill) Hulbig William (Bill) Hulbig William (Bill) Hulbig Prashanth Bagali, PhD Viking Business Development Consultants William (Bill) Hulbig William (Bill) Hulbig 1. OEM partnering example: Start-up has no sales, but has patents and is is far down FDA path to FDA approval on surgical product. Goes to 5 largest OEMs that sell similar product, OEM pays for everything (they get to expense), start-up owners/employees get salary, OEM gets exclusive distribution, in ‘X’ years no matter what OEM buys start-up for a set price (could be worth nothing or $billion, but they buy you out at set price). Best deal out of 5 wins! Simplified version! 2. Incubator VC’s are personal friends and can’t divulge their identity w/o their permission, but they’re based on the East Coast and have great track record. Not sure how they select companies they take. Jorge Cardona Viking Business Development Consultants Tell me more? William (Bill) Hulbig All ones I’ve been referring to are ‘opportunistic’ one-time deals, and there are plenty out there during these troubled times. If you were in the furniture or garment industry you’re probably familiar with factoring which can be used similarly, but you sell or finance your receivables at 2%/month or so I’m told. Crazy to pay 24% on an asset? Not if you make 5x that! I keep looking forward to your next comment! Too bad we can’t more people involved. Getting back to medical devices; start-up partnering with OEMs is viable. We even have a VC-backed medical device incubator locally that invests and even builds the devices! Start-Ups gotta start thinking outta the box. Bob Light More devil advocating: Ok, I see the logic/value in what you are saying, but still argue that realistically, 30-70% returns can not be good long-term financing options for most entrepreneurs either. Also, if done properly for the right reasons, the “marriage” route doesn’t just bring capital into a company, but experience and networks as well (pre-public offerings, as in the big picture, very few companies ever end up going the public route, the worst fail and the best get bought before they do) I still stick to the short-termed nature of these types of transactions. Early in my career I worked in retail office furniture, and would bid on large deals that basically were paper transactions. That is, we never touched the merchandise, only ordered it and had it shipped directly to the customer. The margin was somewhere around 5%. Since my company did not have the cash to cover the cost upfront, we went to our bank and for 1.5% (loan origination fee plus 30 days interest), we were able to do the deal, ending up with a net of 3.5% (this customer paid timely and predictably on terms). The bank made 18% annualized (good deal for them) and we made 42%, just for a small amount of admin work. While this worked out in this case, start-ups created by unemployed professionals (majority being consultative companies) trying to build a long term business won’t have the margins to pay high interest rates over long periods, nor if it just accrues, will they be excited to pay it when it comes due… Art Quillo After funding over 10 imaging centers using a transactionally based loan model and living with investors as well, I’ll take the loan any time. William (Bill) Hulbig I’m finding investors only want to ‘date’ entrepreneurs no ‘marry’ them, and lending has less legal entanglement, no SEC regs, less risk and provides an exit date. I’m really seeing a substantial uptick in adversity to dilution from entrepreneurs. Many unemployed professionals are viewing a start-up as their only alternative to getting job, and dilution is a huge turn-off. They’re out to build a long-term viable business for themselves with out betting on an near-term exit strategy. They supply their own seed money and generating revenue before seeking small of growth capital ‘loans’. Bob Light Marked as spam
|