< 1 min reading time
As originally asked by Jeff Schreiber Hello everyone, I was wondering if anyone had any good ideas for a senior project in developing or improving a current medical device. The project would have to be done in two semesters, so time is an a big factor. My group and I have been brainstorming some ideas, but I thought it would be nice to hear from those of you who work in the industry. Any input would be helpful. Thank you! Azadeh Saeedi Julie Omohundro Beth Ann Fiedler, PhD Julie Omohundro Kiran Kumar Pattnaik David Copeland There are so many possibilitie; * is it US-based or OUS-based? For world market? Developed markets or developing (and possibly underserved/at-risk) markets? Think of ideas that perhaps are common place in the US and available to us, that would fundamentally alter the lives of other countries IF they could afford them at a lower cost * Is there an underserved population in need? Geriatrics or pediatrics? Typically, those smaller populations are under-served with solutions that aren’t quite tailored to them – perhaps they need things to be gentler, smaller, more innocuous or designed better to fit their lives or needs * Look at emerging technologies (the SMP mentioned above for instance) and see how they could be used to deliver increased care or benefit in a new way. What right now seems a bit ‘archaic’ or ‘barbaric’ right now that either some new material, process, etc. would radically reshape and make less scary and traumatic and allow a higher quality of patient care, recovery and quality of life? -David Jerrold Shapiro Jerrold Shapiro Chris Elliott David Selover Lawrence Alpert I’ve been prototyping with SMP on and off for over 20 years, and even though I have had some successes, no prototypes have made it to market for various reasons. Certainly with a concentrated effort and enough capital, someone will be able to harness this strangely wonderful polymer family! Beth Ann Fiedler, PhD Beth Ann Fiedler, PhD Michael Kitchen While possessing incredible properties shape memory materials have remained elusively difficult to control and apply to commercial applications. They offer an opportunity to transition a device in situ having mechanical properties equivalent or better than current open procedure type implants while gaining access to the anatomic site of placement with unprecedented small surgical pathways of access. Potentially so small in fact that the term percutaneous may be more appropriate than “minimally invasive”. We at Restorative Physiology Group have been working specially in the Spine Fusion and Stabilization fields. Placing full sized and fully mechanically capable inter-body and inter-spinus implants with less than 6 mm access catheters. We see potential for development of many different devices across a wide spectrum of clinical fields utilizing both shape memory metal and further down the line thermally transitioned shape memory polymers. Materials that can selectively transition between physical states i.e. from a straight linear element to a formed implant of infinitely variable geometry offer tremendous potential for innovation. Furthermore, this technology will lend itself to precision robotic placement. Jerrold Shapiro Chris Elliott Roberto de Filippo Morgan Tierney Maik Lösel from my point of view it would be interesting if the “state of the art” technology in ventilation – especially in combination with anesthesia really is state of the art (in a technical and economic meaning) or do we paying too much, still for “80th technology”? And for what reason? Cheers Marked as spam
|