Medical Devices Group

  • Community
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Go Premium
« Back to Previous Page
like 8 comments  share
Joe Hage
🔥 Find me at MedicalDevicesGroup.net 🔥
September 2012
Startup Medical Device Companies: Is it necessary to have regulatory employees?
< 1 min reading time

As originally asked by Giovanni Lauricella.


Marked as spam
Posted by Joe Hage
Asked on September 15, 2012 4:56 am
106 views
  • Follow
  • Unfollow
  • Report spam
like 8 comments  share

Meet your next client here. Join our medical devices group community.

Private answer
Joe Hage

Jon Speer
Founder of Greenlight Guru - Helping medical devices get to market faster with less risk
Hire resource (even if consultant) to do a thorough regulatory strategy. Hire someone to address quality system. But don't worry about building the entire QS right away. Bootstrap it, focusing on elements that are needed (e.g. design control, risk management, supplier control). Be sure the QS resource has other valuable skills too to assist with other startup needs.

Throughout development, have regulatory resource "check in" from time to time. As you approach a submission, this resource should start to look more and more like a full time regulatory employee. Same with quality.

Marked as spam
like
  • Report spam
Private answer
Joe Hage

Adolfo Menendez
Design Assurance Engineer at Mindlance
What is 'necessary' should be based on the company goals/objectives? Which regulated markets are you intending to sell the product in? As the numerous suggestions provided illustrate, a viable option to get started is to use regulatory consultants. At some point, for some markets, it may be more practical and/or cost effective to have some 'regulatory employees' to craft and/or implement a suitable quality management system (e.g. policies, procedures, processes, etc) for quality assurance in product development, manufacturing, customer service, etc. For management reviews, quality inspections and/or audits, who would be the management representative that sits with the inspector and/or auditor to review compliance if not the 'regulatory employees'; the alternative would be to have an on-site regulatory consultant(s), essentially 'regulatory employees'.
To use a sport metaphor, if you have an all-star quarterback and receivers, is it really necessary to have blockers? The answer should be yes if you want to the others to be able to succeed at doing what they do best.

Marked as spam
like
  • Report spam
Private answer
Joe Hage

Rob Packard
510(k), CE Marking & Quality System Consultant
This is a timely question. For start-up companies that are seeking CE Marking, the consultant approach could be a potential problem in the future. The proposed regulations include a requirement for a "qualified person". Using an Authorized Representative (AR) won't cut it, because the regulation states that the AR should have a person meeting the same qualifications as the company's regulatory compliance person. This requirement is Article 13 of the MDD/AIMD propoal and also Article 13 in the IVD proposal. It will be interesting to see how the various NB's enforce this and how early they start to audit for this.

Marked as spam
like
  • Report spam
Private answer
Joe Hage

Jean (Gregory) Bigoney, PhD, RAC, CQE
Regulatory Affairs / Materials Engineering
I think it is also worth talking to a regulatory consultant early in order to develop a regulatory and reimbursement strategy that is consistent with the financial goals. How you approach the FDA to obtain clearance can have a bearing on how CMS classifies your device later on.

Many start-ups focus on getting FDA clearance only and end up blindsided by reimbursement decisions that make it difficult for them to be profitable even with a technologically superior product.

Marked as spam
like
  • Report spam
Private answer
Joe Hage

Richard Del Mastro
Director Biomarker Discovery Development at Progenity, Inc.
Agree with all above. Hire a regulatory consultant when you are close to beginning the clinical trials. Get a QA person in now. That covers your QMS part. Make sure your product development team knows how to work in that QMS. Scientists are not trained to work in a regulated environment and continue to work in a research mind set. Getting on top of this from the get go is very important. You must have a R&D leader that knows how to bring that research team into the product development phase and must work closely with the QA person. If you neglect this then you will see extended timelines and costly over-runs. There are many regulatory consultants available. Interview them and make sure that you get one that your team can work with.

Marked as spam
like
  • Report spam
Private answer
Joe Hage

Perry Mykleby
Customer Activation, Engagement & Retention
Agreed. There are qualified Regulatory consultancies. One way or the other you've got to have Regulatory. But QA is also a must to put a Quality system in place. You'll need to cover ISO 13485 and 14971 in addition to the quality requirements of the FDA. One consultant may be able to handle both.

Marked as spam
like
  • Report spam
Private answer
Joe Hage

Marc Hollingworth
Proven Business Leader in Medical Devices and Healthcare
I agree with Erich. Unless the company is doing significant clinical trials there are many excellent consultants in regulatory affiars out there that can assist them short term.

Marked as spam
like
  • Report spam
Private answer
Joe Hage

Erich Coiner
Mechanical Engineer
No. But you should at least have an adviser with deep experience who can sit in on critical review meetings and fill that role.

Marked as spam
like
  • Report spam
« Back to Previous Page
Ask a Question
Leave a Comment

We still use LinkedIn to access our site because it’s the only way to “pull in” your LinkedIn photo, name, and hyperlink to your profile page, all vital in building your professional network. When you log in using LinkedIn, you are giving LinkedIn your password, not me. I never see nor store your LinkedIn credentials.

Stay connected with us.

By signing up you are agreeing to our Privacy Policy.

Categories

  • Capital/Investment
    • Business Model
    • Funding
  • Careers
  • Design/Devel
    • Design
    • Development
    • Human Factors
    • Labeling
    • Material Selection
    • R&D
    • Trials and Post-Market
  • Featured
  • Industry
    • Announcements
    • Device Tax
    • Hospital and Health Care
    • Innovation
    • Medtech
  • LinkedIn, etc.
  • Markets
    • Africa
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Europe
  • Regulating
    • CE Marking
    • EU
    • FDA
    • FDA/EU etc.
    • Notified Bodies
    • Quality
    • Regulatory
  • Selling
    • Distribution
    • Intellectual Property
    • Marketing/Sales
    • Reimbursement
  • Worth bookmarking!
Feature your job here.
logo

Companion to LinkedIn's 350,000 member community

  • Contact
  • Medical Device Marketing
  • In Memoriam
  • Medical Device Conference

The Medical Devices Group   |   Copyright © 2025 Terms, Conditions & Privacy

Medical Devices Group
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.