Medical Devices Group

  • Community
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Go Premium
« Back to Previous Page
like 5 comments  share
Rob Packard
Ship & Print Your FDA eCopy
February 2016
Which FDA Form 483 observation should you fix first?
2 min reading time

A client of mine recently received a FDA Form 483 with multiple inspection observations and they wanted to know how to prioritize their corrective actions. Typically companies will work on corrective actions for each 483 observation in parallel. However, if you receive a 483 observation against your CAPA process, it’s important to address that issue before any of your other inspection observations.

One of the most common 483 observations is specific to corrective and preventive actions (i.e., 21 CFR 820.100). Typically the company has inadequate procedures for verifying and validating effectiveness of corrective actions taken. If this is one of your FDA 483 observations, then you may have a problem with CAPA training or with the design of your CAPA form. If there is no place on the CAPA form to document your effectiveness check, then you might easily forget to perform the verification and validation of effectiveness. Another possibility is that personnel are confused between verification of implementation and the verification of effectiveness.

The FDA will want to see objective evidence of implementing corrective actions whenever possible. If you write your 483 response for other inspection observations first, then the other 483 responses are using the existing procedure or form that the FDA identified as inadequate. If you use your new and improved CAPA procedure and form to document your 483 response, then the FDA will see lots of evidence of your company implementing the revised procedure or form.

Therefore, your first step should always be to implement corrective actions to address an inadequate CAPA process by revising the procedure or the form. Once the procedure or form is updated, then you can use the new process to document the rest of your 483 responses.

I shared more about this issue in my blog that was published this morning;

http://medicaldeviceacademy.com/blog/

If you need help preparing an FDA 483 response, here’s a link for a webinar explaining the 7 steps for responding to an FDA Form 483 inspection observation:

http://medicaldeviceacademy.com/7-steps-respond-fda-483-inspection-observation-webinar/.

source: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/2070960/2070960-6103198324460974083

Marked as spam
Posted by Rob Packard
Asked on February 10, 2016 12:00 am
161 views
  • Follow
  • Unfollow
  • Report spam
like 5 comments  share

Meet your next client here. Join our medical devices group community.

Private answer
David Jones Unless FDA has had a policy change, the observations are usually listed from most (#1) to least serious (#n). While I would normally agree with you that observations against your CAPA system are very important, it would determine the type and number (e.g are you doing the CAPAs and just not documenting them well or timely, or are you failing to do them period?). Consider CAPAs versus an observation on making significant design changes that were not verified/validated and may be directly resulted in a MDR. I think I might go with Design Controls, Change Control, V&V, etc.
Marked as spam
like
  • Report spam
Private answer
Clarisa Tate Agreed. It wouldn't help if the process (CAPA) to address 483's has issues. Fix the process, then address all the other findings using that process.
Marked as spam
like
  • Report spam
Private answer
Thanks for sharing the interesting post.
Marked as spam
like
  • Report spam
Private answer
Rick Rutherford This is excellent advice. As an former FDA Investigator, I often observed this advice was not implemented fully and garnered a Warning Letter.
Marked as spam
like
  • Report spam
Private answer
This is exactly the kind of advice most of us QA/RA leaders are looking for, many thanks Robert Packard.
Marked as spam
like
  • Report spam
« Back to Previous Page
Ask a Question
Leave a Comment

We still use LinkedIn to access our site because it’s the only way to “pull in” your LinkedIn photo, name, and hyperlink to your profile page, all vital in building your professional network. When you log in using LinkedIn, you are giving LinkedIn your password, not me. I never see nor store your LinkedIn credentials.

Stay connected with us.

By signing up you are agreeing to our Privacy Policy.

Categories

  • Capital/Investment
    • Business Model
    • Funding
  • Careers
  • Design/Devel
    • Design
    • Development
    • Human Factors
    • Labeling
    • Material Selection
    • R&D
    • Trials and Post-Market
  • Featured
  • Industry
    • Announcements
    • Device Tax
    • Hospital and Health Care
    • Innovation
    • Medtech
  • LinkedIn, etc.
  • Markets
    • Africa
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Europe
  • Regulating
    • CE Marking
    • EU
    • FDA
    • FDA/EU etc.
    • Notified Bodies
    • Quality
    • Regulatory
  • Selling
    • Distribution
    • Intellectual Property
    • Marketing/Sales
    • Reimbursement
  • Worth bookmarking!
Feature your job here.
logo

Companion to LinkedIn's 350,000 member community

  • Contact
  • Medical Device Marketing
  • In Memoriam
  • Medical Device Conference

The Medical Devices Group   |   Copyright © 2025 Terms, Conditions & Privacy

Medical Devices Group
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.